Let Survivors Lead

Let Survivors Lead
Doreen Nicholas - Sat Jun 06, 2009 @ 11:43AM
Comments: 3
NATN/SEEDs was founded by survivors. We are invested in promoting survivors to leadership positions. I would like to start a discussion based on the following statement.
 
" Let Survivors LeadThe violence-against-women movement has to, once again, become a movement and not just a network of social-service providers. Violence will only end when survivors are seen as potential organizers on their own behalf, rather than simply clients of social workers, lawyers, judges or medical personnel."
 
- Andrea Smith, Professor of American Culture and Women's Studies, University of Michigan and Cofounder of Incite! Women of Color Against Violence
 
What do you think? Do you agree with Andrea? Who knows better what we need than us? Please share your thoughts and comments.
Comments: 3

Comments

1. Vickie Florschuetz  |  my website   |   Sat Jun 06, 2009 @ 11:50AM

Yes, I think that survivors being involved is an integral part to change and improvement because of personal of experience. That does not mean that one must have been a victim of abuse to be part of the movement against abuse, but it helps to learn from someone who has been there.

2. Leah Heathcoat   |   Sun Jun 07, 2009 @ 01:06PM

I couldn't agree more that survivors should be an integral part of the DV services world!. If they were, there would be much more emphasis on the things that matter to survivors and not some prescribed methodology. DV survivors are not a monolithic group. There are significant differences among the survivors themselves and as an advocate I continually learned that there could not be a one size fits all approach either. I also believe that if survivors were more involved in the movement there would be a significantly larger effort to address the perpetrators and I do NOT mean incarceration. These perpetrators are our fathers, brothers and sons and we cannot just continue to write them all off--however unpopular that opinion may be I believe it is a glaringly large deficit in the movement against dv.

3. Pam Moore   |   Mon Jun 29, 2009 @ 11:10AM

I totally agree as well. I believe that if victims were more involved there might actually more that would get done, nationally and legally. Everyone wants to closes thier eyes and think that it could not happen to them or someone in thier families. I think if victims were involved people would see that it truely can and does happen to anyone!! I think it would help get rid of some of the steriotypes there are about "victims of DV" . I know there is this huge struggle now of what we call these ladies, victims, survivors, clients, etc. I am here to say that I was a victim and am now a survivor I am no one client!! I think victims would relate more and be more open about some of the things that have happened if they felt the advocate knew where they were coming from. No one can truely understand what we have been through unless you have been there yourself. (Just my opinion) These ladies are strong individuals that have lived in battles zones and are still alive to talk about it. We NEED them in the movement and if we are truely out to change how the world looks and DV and have it not be acceptable then we MUST have these women and thier voices involved in this movement.

Post a Comment




This non-profits service by Grassroots.org and Doodlekit™ Free Website Builder